202.dk

📜 Historical scan 2026-06-16 13:13:04  ·  ← Latest scan
⬇ Zone File 📜 Timeline & History ⚡ Scan Now

202.dk is a .dk domain served by 5 nameservers (ns1.gigahost.dk, ns2.gigahost.dk, ns3.gigahost.dk and 2 more). It was registered on 21 May 2001 (WHOIS) and was already in the .dk zone when our tracking began on 16 June 2026. Its website address 46.183.138.100 is hosted by Sentia Denmark A/S (AS47292) in Denmark. Mail is handled by mx1.gigahost.dk, mx2.gigahost.dk and 1 more. The zone is not DNSSEC-signed, publishes a DMARC policy and has no IPv6 address. Below are all of its DNS records from this scan: nameservers, A/AAAA, MX, TXT, SPF, DMARC, CAA, TLSA/DANE, MTA-STS, SRV and more.

🖥️ Nameservers#

5 records   2039ms
NameserverIP addressesPTRASN / ISP
ns1.gigahost.dk — — —
ns2.gigahost.dk — — —
ns3.gigahost.dk — — —
ns4.gigahost.dk — — —
ns5.gigahost.dk — — —

🌍 A Records#

1 records   2035ms
IPTTLPTRASNISP / OrgCIDRCountryCity
46.183.138.100 — — AS47292 Sentia Denmark A/S 46.183.138.0/23 🇩🇰 Denmark —

📧 MX Records#

3 records   2034ms

🔷 AAAA Records (IPv6)#

✗ No AAAA records — IPv6 not configured

🔐 HTTPS Records#

✗ No HTTPS RR — no SVCB/HTTPS service binding

📝 TXT Records#

2 records   2232ms
TXT Record
spf2.0/pra
v=spf1 mx include:spf.gigahost.dk -all

✉️ SPF#

PolicyRecord (202.dk)
-all (hard fail) v=spf1 mx include:spf.gigahost.dk -all

📨 DMARC#

PolicyRecord (_dmarc.202.dk)
p=reject v=DMARC1; p=reject;

📬 MTA-STS#

✗ No MTA-STS policy — SMTP TLS not enforced

📈 TLSRPT#

✗ No TLSRPT record — no SMTP TLS failure reporting

📜 CAA Records#

✗ No CAA records — any CA may issue certificates

🧩 Web & zone#

latest probe, not this scan · checked 2026-10-15 11:55:57
www CNAME202.dk (all on 202.dk)
www vs bare domainSame network
WildcardYes: any name under the zone resolves

🔎 SPF check#

zone-wide SPF report

DNS lookups: 2/10 · policy: -all

No problems found

🔗 TLSA / DANE#

✗ No TLSA records — DANE not configured for HTTPS (_443) or MX (_25)

🔐 DNSSEC#

1595ms
CheckResult
Validation Status🔓 Insecure
AD Flag (resolver validates)✗ Not set
DS Record✗ Not found
DNSKEY Record✗ Not found
Flagsunsigned answer

🏷️ SOA#

2034ms
FieldValue
Serial2026061203
Primary NS (MNAME)ns1.gigahost.dk
Responsible (RNAME)hostmaster@202.dk
Refresh10800s
Retry3600s
Expire604800s
Minimum (neg-cache TTL)3600s

📋 Registration#

WHOIS fetched 2026-10-15 12:15:45
FieldValue
RegistrarPunktum dk A/S (direct)
Registered2001-05-21
Expires2027-06-30 (256d)

🔗 Same registrant#

1 domain

Other .dk domains whose WHOIS registrant has the same name and postal address. Matched on a keyed hash: the registrant's details are not stored or shown. Covers only domains whose WHOIS we have fetched (refreshed about monthly).

DomainRegistrar
nask.dkPunktum dk A/S (direct)
📋 WHOIS#

⏱️ Lookup Timing#

NS
2039ms
A
2035ms
MX
2034ms
AAAA
53ms
TXT
2232ms
CAA
315ms
HTTPS
2297ms
TLSA
93ms
SOA
2034ms
MTA-STS
323ms
DNSSEC
1595ms
SRV
0ms
Total
2990ms

🕐 Scan History#

Scanned AtDurationRecordsDNSSEC
2026-10-15 11:55:57 762ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-10-08 20:39:40 969ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-10-01 19:25:24 1424ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-24 17:48:14 9519ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-20 00:13:31 726ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-13 00:59:27 792ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-03 02:37:01 912ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-27 14:06:46 647ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-20 04:17:30 1412ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-14 04:58:04 17355ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-06 12:02:36 1461ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-01 09:32:31 1477ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-07-24 08:58:08 1208ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-07-17 08:21:54 1007ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-07-10 02:44:23 1141ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-07-03 19:29:05 2848ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-25 22:12:56 915ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-19 17:37:59 1039ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-16 13:29:12 10991ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-16 13:13:04 shown 2990ms 5 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
dhd.dk [/] search Domains, Hosts & DNS — .dk zone