boligviborg.dk

📜 Historical scan 2026-07-01 23:59:00  ·  ← Latest scan
⬇ Zone File 📜 Timeline & History ⚡ Scan Now

boligviborg.dk is a .dk domain served by 2 nameservers (ns1.egdatainform.dk, ns2.egdatainform.dk). It was registered on 14 June 2001 (WHOIS) and was already in the .dk zone when our tracking began on 16 June 2026. Its website address 185.154.243.151 is hosted by team.blue Denmark A/S (AS48854) in Denmark. Mail is handled by boligviborg-dk.mx1-dk.mailanyone.net, boligviborg-dk.mx2-dk.mailanyone.net and 1 more. The zone is not DNSSEC-signed, publishes a DMARC policy and has no IPv6 address. Below are all of its DNS records from this scan: nameservers, A/AAAA, MX, TXT, SPF, DMARC, CAA, TLSA/DANE, MTA-STS, SRV and more.

🖥️ Nameservers#

2 records   197ms

🌍 A Records#

1 records   228ms

📧 MX Records#

3 records   190ms

🔷 AAAA Records (IPv6)#

✗ No AAAA records — IPv6 not configured

🔐 HTTPS Records#

✗ No HTTPS RR — no SVCB/HTTPS service binding

🔌 SRV Records#

1 records   256ms
ServicePriorityWeightPortTarget
_autodiscover._tcp 0 0 443 autodiscover.egbolig.dk

📝 TXT Records#

2 records   500ms
TXT Record
MS=ms86367229
v=spf1 ip4:87.51.2.0/26 include:_spf-hosting.eg.dk include:spf.comendosystems.com include:spf.incom-it.dk v=spf1 ip4:87.51.2.0/26 include:_spf-hosting.eg.dk include:spf.comendosystems.com include:spf.incom-it.dk include:sendgrid.net -all

✉️ SPF#

📨 DMARC#

PolicyRecord (_dmarc.boligviborg.dk)
p=none (monitor only) v=DMARC1; p=none;

📬 MTA-STS#

✗ No MTA-STS policy — SMTP TLS not enforced

📈 TLSRPT#

✗ No TLSRPT record — no SMTP TLS failure reporting

📜 CAA Records#

✗ No CAA records — any CA may issue certificates

🧩 Web & zone#

latest probe, not this scan · checked 2026-10-09 00:10:25
www185.154.243.151 (AS48854) (address records, no CNAME)
www vs bare domainSame network
boligviborg.dk: 185.154.243.151 (AS48854)
www.boligviborg.dk: 185.154.243.151 (AS48854)
WildcardNo

✍️ DKIM keys#

2 found
SelectorCNAMEKey
s1 s1.domainkey.u21914857.wl108.sendgrid.net RSA · ~2048 bit
s2 s2.domainkey.u21914857.wl108.sendgrid.net RSA · ~2048 bit

DKIM selectors can't be listed, so we check the common ones (Microsoft 365, Google, Mailchimp, SendGrid, generic). Keys under other selectors aren't shown.

🔎 SPF check#

zone-wide SPF report

DNS lookups: 12/10 · policy: -all

  • error 12 DNS lookups: the limit is 10, so a receiver whose evaluation gets past the 10th returns permerror (SPF fails)

🔗 TLSA / DANE#

✗ No TLSA records — DANE not configured for HTTPS (_443) or MX (_25)

🔐 DNSSEC#

371ms
CheckResult
Validation Status🔓 Insecure
AD Flag (resolver validates)✗ Not set
DS Record✗ Not found
DNSKEY Record✗ Not found
Flagsunsigned answer

🏷️ SOA#

236ms
FieldValue
Serial2910738976
Primary NS (MNAME)ns1.egdatainform.dk
Responsible (RNAME)hostmaster@egdatainform.dk
Refresh43200s
Retry3600s
Expire2678400s
Minimum (neg-cache TTL)3600s

📋 Registration#

WHOIS fetched 2026-10-13 02:12:08
FieldValue
RegistrarPunktum dk A/S (direct)
Registered2001-06-14
Expires2027-06-30 (251d)

🔗 Same registrant#

0 domains

Other .dk domains whose WHOIS registrant has the same name and postal address. Matched on a keyed hash: the registrant's details are not stored or shown. Covers only domains whose WHOIS we have fetched (refreshed about monthly).

No other domain with this registrant in our WHOIS data yet
📋 WHOIS#

⏱️ Lookup Timing#

NS
197ms
A
228ms
MX
190ms
AAAA
231ms
TXT
500ms
CAA
272ms
HTTPS
220ms
TLSA
280ms
SOA
236ms
MTA-STS
292ms
DNSSEC
371ms
SRV
256ms
Total
5148ms

🕐 Scan History#

Scanned AtDurationRecordsDNSSEC
2026-10-03 21:35:51 1127ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-10-01 03:24:17 1084ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-29 08:20:59 1317ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-26 06:54:50 1580ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-25 06:40:27 945ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-24 06:24:28 3234ms 2 NS 1 A 4 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-01 11:56:11 2888ms 2 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-07-01 23:59:00 shown 5148ms 2 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-16 15:45:40 602ms 2 NS 1 A 3 MX 🔓 Insecure
dhd.dk [/] search Domains, Hosts & DNS — .dk zone