danskbaandtryk.dk

📜 Historical scan 2026-06-17 00:30:44  ·  ← Latest scan
⬇ Zone File 📜 Timeline & History ⚡ Scan Now

danskbaandtryk.dk is a .dk domain served by 2 nameservers (ns.gpserver.dk, ns2.gpserver.com). It was registered on 8 June 2000 (WHOIS) and was already in the .dk zone when our tracking began on 16 June 2026. Its website address 144.76.156.123 is hosted by Hetzner Online GmbH (AS24940) in Germany. Mail is handled by danskbaandtryk-dk.mail.protection.outlook.com. The zone is not DNSSEC-signed, publishes a DMARC policy and has no IPv6 address. Below are all of its DNS records from this scan: nameservers, A/AAAA, MX, TXT, SPF, DMARC, CAA, TLSA/DANE, MTA-STS, SRV and more.

🖥️ Nameservers#

2 records   58ms
NameserverIP addressesPTRASN / ISP
ns.gpserver.dk — — —
ns2.gpserver.com — — —

🌍 A Records#

1 records   57ms

📧 MX Records#

1 records   57ms

🔷 AAAA Records (IPv6)#

✗ No AAAA records — IPv6 not configured

🔐 HTTPS Records#

✗ No HTTPS RR — no SVCB/HTTPS service binding

📝 TXT Records#

3 records   139ms
TXT Record
google-site-verification=7SLkdwvo__xrVTqZrp3SVJDGoxWKtj3jxNh0P9SBJnM
MS=ms88284410
v=spf1 a ip4:148.251.237.203 ip4:5.9.241.52 ip4:138.201.32.130 include:spf.goldenplanet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

✉️ SPF#

PolicyRecord (danskbaandtryk.dk)
-all (hard fail) v=spf1 a ip4:148.251.237.203 ip4:5.9.241.52 ip4:138.201.32.130 include:spf.goldenplanet.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

📨 DMARC#

PolicyRecord (_dmarc.danskbaandtryk.dk)
p=reject v=DMARC1; p=reject; rua=mailto:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

📬 MTA-STS#

✗ No MTA-STS policy — SMTP TLS not enforced

📈 TLSRPT#

✗ No TLSRPT record — no SMTP TLS failure reporting

📜 CAA Records#

✗ No CAA records — any CA may issue certificates

🧩 Web & zone#

latest probe, not this scan · checked 2026-10-08 12:47:15
www144.76.156.123 (AS24940) (address records, no CNAME)
www vs bare domainSame network
danskbaandtryk.dk: 144.76.156.123 (AS24940)
www.danskbaandtryk.dk: 144.76.156.123 (AS24940)
WildcardYes: any name under the zone resolves

✍️ DKIM keys#

3 found
SelectorCNAMEKey
mail — RSA · ~1024 bit below 2048 bit
selector1 selector1-danskbaandtryk-dk._domainkey.deslabelsas.w-v1.dkim.mail.microsoft RSA · ~2048 bit
selector2 selector2-danskbaandtryk-dk._domainkey.deslabelsas.w-v1.dkim.mail.microsoft RSA · ~2048 bit

DKIM selectors can't be listed, so we check the common ones (Microsoft 365, Google, Mailchimp, SendGrid, generic). Keys under other selectors aren't shown.

🔎 SPF check#

zone-wide SPF report

DNS lookups: 4/10 · policy: -all

No problems found

🔗 TLSA / DANE#

✗ No TLSA records — DANE not configured for HTTPS (_443) or MX (_25)

🔐 DNSSEC#

105ms
CheckResult
Validation Status🔓 Insecure
AD Flag (resolver validates)✗ Not set
DS Record✗ Not found
DNSKEY Record✗ Not found
Flagsunsigned answer

🏷️ SOA#

35ms
FieldValue
Serial24
Primary NS (MNAME)ns.gpserver.dk
Responsible (RNAME)hostmaster@gpserver.dk
Refresh14400s
Retry3600s
Expire604800s
Minimum (neg-cache TTL)28800s

📋 Registration#

WHOIS fetched 2026-10-19 22:29:15
FieldValue
RegistrarPunktum dk A/S (direct)
Registered2000-06-08
Expires2028-06-30 (619d)

🔗 Same registrant#

0 domains

Other .dk domains whose WHOIS registrant has the same name and postal address. Matched on a keyed hash: the registrant's details are not stored or shown. Covers only domains whose WHOIS we have fetched (refreshed about monthly).

No other domain with this registrant in our WHOIS data yet
📋 WHOIS#

⏱️ Lookup Timing#

NS
58ms
A
57ms
MX
57ms
AAAA
57ms
TXT
139ms
CAA
37ms
HTTPS
55ms
TLSA
2723ms
SOA
35ms
MTA-STS
90ms
DNSSEC
105ms
SRV
0ms
Total
3189ms

🕐 Scan History#

Scanned AtDurationRecordsDNSSEC
2026-07-06 06:04:05 1980ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-30 11:41:59 858ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-24 08:07:36 1358ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX ❓ Unknown
2026-06-22 16:36:00 969ms 0 NS 0 A 0 MX ❓ Unknown
2026-06-22 15:37:26 1132ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-17 00:46:57 1945ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-17 00:30:44 shown 3189ms 2 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
dhd.dk [/] search Domains, Hosts & DNS — .dk zone