genux.dk

📜 Historical scan 2026-06-24 22:31:07  ·  ← Latest scan
⬇ Zone File 📜 Timeline & History ⚡ Scan Now

genux.dk is a .dk domain served by 3 nameservers (ns1.vths.dk, ns2.vths.dk, ns3.vths.dk). It was registered on 24 November 2008 (WHOIS) and was already in the .dk zone when our tracking began on 16 June 2026. Its website address 93.191.158.75 is hosted by team.blue Denmark A/S (AS48854) in Denmark. Mail is handled by genux-dk.mail.protection.outlook.com. The zone is not DNSSEC-signed, publishes a DMARC policy and has no IPv6 address. Below are all of its DNS records from this scan: nameservers, A/AAAA, MX, TXT, SPF, DMARC, CAA, TLSA/DANE, MTA-STS, SRV and more.

🖥️ Nameservers#

3 records   81ms

🌍 A Records#

1 records   87ms

📧 MX Records#

1 records   83ms

📧 Autodiscover / Autoconfig#

ServiceCNAME / IP
🔷 Autodiscoverautodiscover.outlook.com → 40.104.116.8
🔶 Autoconfig93.191.158.75

🔷 AAAA Records (IPv6)#

✗ No AAAA records — IPv6 not configured

🔐 HTTPS Records#

✗ No HTTPS RR — no SVCB/HTTPS service binding

📝 TXT Records#

2 records   731ms
TXT Record
v=spf1 ip4:93.191.158.75 include:amazonses.com include:amazonses.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
VisorTech Hosting Solutions - info@vths.dk

✉️ SPF#

PolicyRecord (genux.dk)
-all (hard fail) v=spf1 ip4:93.191.158.75 include:amazonses.com include:amazonses.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

📨 DMARC#

PolicyRecord (_dmarc.genux.dk)
p=reject v=DMARC1;p=reject;pct=50;rua=mailto:noreply@jgenux.dk;ruf=mailto:noreply@genux.dk;ri=86400;aspf=s;adkim=s;fo=1;

📬 MTA-STS#

✗ No MTA-STS policy — SMTP TLS not enforced

📈 TLSRPT#

✗ No TLSRPT record — no SMTP TLS failure reporting

📜 CAA Records#

✗ No CAA records — any CA may issue certificates

🧩 Web & zone#

latest probe, not this scan · checked 2026-10-12 14:35:59
www93.191.158.75 (AS48854) (address records, no CNAME)
www vs bare domainSame network
genux.dk: 93.191.158.75 (AS48854)
www.genux.dk: 93.191.158.75 (AS48854)
WildcardYes: any name under the zone resolves

✍️ DKIM keys#

3 found
SelectorCNAMEKey
k1 dkim.mcsv.net RSA · ~1024 bit below 2048 bit
selector1 selector1-genux-dk._domainkey.genux1.onmicrosoft.com RSA · ~1024 bit below 2048 bit
selector2 selector2-genux-dk._domainkey.genux1.onmicrosoft.com RSA · ~1024 bit below 2048 bit

DKIM selectors can't be listed, so we check the common ones (Microsoft 365, Google, Mailchimp, SendGrid, generic). Keys under other selectors aren't shown.

🔎 SPF check#

zone-wide SPF report

DNS lookups: 4/10 · policy: -all

No problems found

🔗 TLSA / DANE#

✗ No TLSA records — DANE not configured for HTTPS (_443) or MX (_25)

🔐 DNSSEC#

100ms
CheckResult
Validation Status🔓 Insecure
AD Flag (resolver validates)✗ Not set
DS Record✗ Not found
DNSKEY Record✗ Not found
Flagsunsigned answer

🏷️ SOA#

79ms
FieldValue
Serial2026040700
Primary NS (MNAME)ns1.vths.dk
Responsible (RNAME)dns@vths.dk
Refresh3600s
Retry1800s
Expire1209600s
Minimum (neg-cache TTL)86400s

📋 Registration#

WHOIS fetched 2026-10-09 09:49:28
FieldValue
RegistrarPunktum dk A/S (direct)
Registered2008-11-24
Expires2026-11-30 (44d)
📋 WHOIS#

⏱️ Lookup Timing#

NS
81ms
A
87ms
MX
83ms
AAAA
80ms
TXT
731ms
CAA
67ms
HTTPS
95ms
TLSA
171ms
SOA
79ms
MTA-STS
80ms
DNSSEC
100ms
SRV
783ms
Total
1335ms

🕐 Scan History#

Scanned AtDurationRecordsDNSSEC
2026-09-30 20:36:26 1825ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-09-29 20:29:09 1179ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-27 14:05:58 3069ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-08-26 13:45:18 1836ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-07-03 08:59:04 1673ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-27 20:59:07 1828ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-27 12:58:27 1961ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-24 22:31:07 shown 1335ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-24 22:06:58 1025ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-23 16:33:21 1165ms 0 NS 0 A 0 MX ❓ Unknown
2026-06-23 03:45:09 1526ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
2026-06-22 11:02:33 1131ms 0 NS 0 A 0 MX ❓ Unknown
2026-06-17 09:33:23 775ms 3 NS 1 A 1 MX 🔓 Insecure
dhd.dk [/] search Domains, Hosts & DNS — .dk zone